Tag: Smegenų vaizdinimas

  • New brain-mapping study suggests psychedelics mute visual reality and amplify memory signals

    New brain-mapping study suggests psychedelics mute visual reality and amplify memory signals

    Psychedelic substances act on the brain by binding to serotonin receptors. Scientists have identified at least 14 different receptors that respond to the neurotransmitter serotonin. Psychedelics are especially drawn to one known as the 2A receptor. This receptor not only affects learning but also dampens activity in parts of the brain responsible for processing visual information.

    “We have observed in earlier studies that visual processes in the brain are suppressed by this receptor,” says Callum White, first author of the study. “This means that visual information about things happening in the outside world becomes less accessible to our consciousness. To fill this gap in the puzzle, our brain inserts fragments from memory — it hallucinates.”

    In other words, when incoming visual signals are reduced, the brain compensates by pulling stored images and experiences from memory. Those internally generated fragments can blend into perception, producing hallucinations.

    Slow Brain Waves Shift Perception Toward Memory

    The researchers also uncovered how this shift unfolds in real time. Psychedelics increase rhythmic patterns of brain activity, known as oscillations, in visual regions. Oscillations are coordinated waves of neural firing that help different parts of the brain communicate with each other.

    After psychedelics were administered, the team observed a rise in low-frequency (5-Hz) waves in visual areas. These slower waves stimulated another region called the retrosplenial cortex, a key hub involved in accessing stored memories. As this communication strengthens, the brain enters a different operating mode. Awareness of current external events becomes weaker, while perception relies more heavily on recalled information. As Professor Dirk Jancke, who led the study, describes it, the experience is “a bit like partial dreaming.”

    Real-Time Brain Imaging Reveals the Mechanism

    To capture these changes, the scientists used an advanced optical imaging technique that tracks neural activity across the entire surface of the brain in real time. The experiments relied on specially engineered mice created by Professor Thomas Knöpfel at Hong Kong Baptist University. These animals were designed to produce fluorescent proteins in specific types of brain cells.

    This approach allowed researchers to pinpoint the source of the signals they recorded. “We therefore know exactly in our experiments that the measured fluorescent signals originate from pyramidal cells of the cortical layers 2/3 and 5, which mediate communication within and between brain regions,” says Jancke. These cells play a central role in transmitting information across the cortex.

    Implications for Depression and Anxiety Treatment

    The findings may also help refine psychedelic-assisted therapy. Researchers believe that, under medical supervision, these substances can temporarily shift brain activity in ways that encourage the recall of positive memories and weaken deeply ingrained negative thought patterns.

    “When used under medical supervision, such substances can temporarily change the state of the brain to selectively recall positive memory content and restructure learned, excessively negative thought patterns, i.e., to be able to unlearn negative context. It will be exciting to see how such therapies are further personalized in the future,” says Jancke.

    By clarifying how psychedelics redirect perception from the outside world to internal memory networks, the study provides a clearer biological explanation for both hallucinations and the growing therapeutic potential of these compounds.

  • How reward bias can make lies feel true, especially from friends

    How reward bias can make lies feel true, especially from friends

    New neuroscience research is adding detail to a familiar problem: people often struggle to spot dishonesty, particularly when the message sounds beneficial. The findings suggest that the promise of a gain can subtly weaken how carefully we evaluate whether information is true.

    The study, led by Yingjie Liu of North China University of Science and Technology, tested how people judge messages depending on who delivers them. Researchers focused on whether trust shifts when information comes from a friend versus a less familiar person.

    Inside the brain during deception

    Using brain imaging with 66 healthy adults, the team examined neural activity while participants exchanged information through computer screens. Messages were framed around outcomes described as gains or losses, allowing scientists to track how reward and risk contexts shape belief.

    Across the experiment, participants were more likely to accept false information in gain situations. Brain regions linked to reward processing, risk assessment and interpreting others’ intentions showed patterns consistent with relaxed scrutiny when a positive outcome seemed possible.

    Why friends can be persuasive

    Friendship added another layer: when a friend delivered the potentially misleading message, the pair showed synchronized brain activity. That alignment shifted with context, strengthening in reward-related areas during gains and in risk-related areas during losses.

    Researchers reported that these shared neural patterns helped predict when someone was most likely to be misled by a friend. The results point to a mechanism in which social closeness and reward expectations combine to make certain claims feel credible even when they should prompt doubt.

    While the work does not mean people always trust friends blindly, it highlights a consistent vulnerability. In everyday decisions, offers that appear mutually beneficial may deserve extra verification, precisely because the brain can treat them as safer than they are.